Vasquez v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The applicant alleges two prejudicial errors in the commission proceedings: (1) The commission erred when it based its decision on the hearing examiner’s incomplete synopsis of the evidence; and (2) a certain medical report was improperly admitted.
Examiner's Synopsis.
A review by the industrial commission on the basis of an examiner’s synopsis constitutes a permissible and proper review of the evidence under sec. 102.18 (3), Stats., which requires that the commission’s action be based on a review of the evidence submitted. 2 This procedure is predicated partly on the proposition that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Scholz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Berg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bumpas v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Carley Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Inc. v. BosquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Romero v. S. S. Kresge Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Reich v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Altiere v. BremerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.