Legal Opinion

Vasquez v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1968No. 233PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The applicant alleges two prejudicial errors in the commission proceedings: (1) The commission erred when it based its decision on the hearing examiner’s incomplete synopsis of the evidence; and (2) a certain medical report was improperly admitted.

Examiner's Synopsis.

A review by the industrial commission on the basis of an examiner’s synopsis constitutes a permissible and proper review of the evidence under sec. 102.18 (3), Stats., which requires that the commission’s action be based on a review of the evidence submitted. 2 This procedure is predicated partly on the proposition that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Scholz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Berg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bumpas v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Carley Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Inc. v. BosquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Romero v. S. S. Kresge Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Reich v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Altiere v. BremerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API