Legal Opinion
Winn v. Shugart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 29, 1940No. 2033PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
Bruce Sullivan1 was engaged with Henry Wilkinson2 in operating an oil refinery at Dayton, New Mexico, in the name of Sullivan Refineries, Inc.3 The Refinery had a working agreement with Maljamar Oil and Gas Corporation4 whereby the Refinery agreed to refine the Maljamar’s oil, under an arrangement whereby the refinery was to deliver to Maljamar 83% and retain as its own 17% of the refined products. The Refinery as principal and Sullivan and Wilkinson as sureties executed a bond in the principal sum of $45,000 to the Maljamar, guaranteeing performance of the agreement. M.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Baker v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Standard Oil Co. of Colorado v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Taylor v. Salt Creek Consol. Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Redman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Modisette v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Potash Co. of America v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Alexander v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.