Legal Opinion

United States v. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 27, 2010No. C 09-4029 MHPPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Re: Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim; Defendants’ Motion for a Judicial Determination Regarding the Nature of the Case

MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.

Defendant Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds and Insurance Agency, Inc. (“G & G”) is engaged in posting immigration bonds with the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) for, inter alia, the release of aliens from detention pending a determination of the alien’s immigration status. 8 C.F.R. § 236.1(c). Defendant American Surety (“ACS”) is a federally-approved surety company for whom G & G posted immigration bonds. The…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Statewide Bonding, Inc. v. DHSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  2. Rahman v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  3. United States v. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Naveen K. Vudhamari v. Administrative Review BoardDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
  5. Statewide Bonding, Inc v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API