Legal Opinion
Rahman v. Napolitano
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 9, 2011No. Case C09-1269 RSMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. ## 99; 103. Plaintiffs, Mr. Rashid Abdur Rahman and family, filed this action for a declaratory judgment and mandamus relief, seeking favorable Court action regarding several immigrant visa petitions filed by Mr. Rah-man’s former employer on behalf of Mr. Rahman. The Court heard oral argument on this matter on November 8, 2011. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment shall be…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gourgen Movsisian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio YangSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. United States Department of the Navy James Webb, as Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Medina v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Rubio Hernandez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023