Legal Opinion

Joerres v. Koscielniak

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The defendants state that, although the trial court found specifically they were trustees under an implied trust, it appears from other findings of fact that they were held to have been trustees under a constructive trust. Generally, implied trusts are those that arise by operation of law, and the term is sufficiently broad to cover constructive trusts and also resulting trusts in those states that recognize them. Sec. 231.06, Stats., refers to implied trusts and provides that prior sections of the statutes abolishing uses and trusts in part shall not extend to trusts arising by implication…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Will of Leonard v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Bishop v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Masino v. SechrestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Nehls v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomasi v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Gorski v. GorskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Richards v. BarryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Barry v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Bautista v. SchneiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API