Legal Opinion

Lowe v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 14, 1960No. 7 Div. 407Published

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Upon mature deliberation and after careful consideration of the application for certiorari, we are of opinion that the writ was improvidently issued, .that the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeals is correct, and that the judgment of that court is due *700to be affirmed. See: National Casualty Co. v. Dunn, 209 Ala. 484, 96 So. 576; Ex parte Corona Coal Co., 213 Ala. 554, 105 So. 718; Connelly v. State, 30 Ala.App. 91, 1 So.2d 606, certiorari denied 241 Ala. 132, 1 So.2d 608; Nobles v. State, 30 Ala.App. 434, 7 So.2d 770, certiorari denied 242 Ala. 643, 7 So.2d 773.

Affirmed.

A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connelly v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Connelly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. National Casualty Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Nobles v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Corona Coal Co. v. SextonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API