National Casualty Co. v. Dunn
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
It is clear that the evidence did not support plaintiff’s replication 2, alleging that he gave notice of his illness as soon as it was reasonably possible for him to do so.
It is equally clear that, regardless of the assumption of Walker’s agency for defendant for the purpose of adjusting plaintiff’s claimj the evidence does not show a denial by defendant of all liability on the policy, as alleged in replication 4-
But, evidence of Walker’s agency having been admitted, the issue under replication 3 could not properly be withdrawn from the jury, and the general affirmative charge for plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rutledge v. RowlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Postal Telegraph Co. v. LenoirSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Gilley v. DenmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Womack v. Myrick Lumbert Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Small v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Biggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Corona Coal Co. v. SextonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- S.J.R. v. F.M.R.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.