Legal Opinion

Riggs-Orr Investment Co. v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1936No. 29606PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

Defendants city of Omaha and School District of the city of Omaha appeal from judgments against them for separate amounts.

Plaintiff was the owner of a tract at the northwest corner of Harney and Twentieth streets in Omaha, fronting south on Harney street 95 feet and east on Twentieth street 132 feet. In April, 1926, the county assessor duly assessed the entire tract, and in August, 1926, the taxes on the tract were duly levied, with certain portions thereof for the 1927 taxes for the city and the school district.

*698On March 30, 1926, the city passed an ordinance declaring the necessity of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monteith v. Alpha High School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Dorland v. City of HumboldtNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Welton v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Foster v. Pierce CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Fremont, E. & M. V. R. v. Holt CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scudder v. County of BuffaloNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API