Legal Opinion

Dorland v. City of Humboldt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1935No. 29547PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an action at law against the city of Humboldt, by a trustee acting for many taxpayers, to recover assessments paid by them which were held to have been illegal and void. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff on more than 20 of the causes of action, and dismissed other causes of action. The city of Humboldt has. appealed.

In this case an amended petition of 21 pages was filed, setting out 30 separate causes of action. Exhibit A, attached to this amended petition, is an assignment to Herbert V. Dorland, trustee, by 30 owners of property in improvement district No. 2 of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Horbach v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Monteith v. Alpha High School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gould v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Garver v. City of HumboldtNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Welton v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baltimore County v. Churchill, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Mills v. Smith Baking Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kennedy v. Dawes CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Satterfield v. BrittonNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Wats Marketing of America, Inc. v. BoehmNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API