Legal Opinion

Foster v. Pierce County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Pierce county. Heard below before Barnes, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb J.,

The account of the plaintiff against Pierce county, made •out in fair mercantile form, and verified by his attorney, claiming $435.87 as due from the said county to the plaintiff, was presented to the county board, by which it was •duly examined, considered, and rejected. The plaintiff took an appeal to the district court, where the cause was dismissed, on motion of the defendant, “for the reason that the claim does not show a demand which the defendants were authorized to act upon.” And the plaintiff brings .the cause to this court on error. The errors assigned are, the sustaining by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bellinger v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. PatrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Welton v. Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Dixon County v. BeardshearNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Fremont, E. & M. V. R. v. Holt CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Riggs-Orr Investment Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API