Legal Opinion
Carroll Township Authority v. Municipal Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 29, 1992No. 2134 and 2135 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGINLEY, Judge.
The present action in mandamus is yet another battle in a long legal war between the Municipal Authority of the City of Monongahela (Mon Authority) and the City of Monongahela (City) on one side and the Township of Carroll and its supervisors and treasurer (Township) and the Carroll Township Authority and its members (Carroll Authority) on the other. The dispute arises out of a sewage treatment agreement among the parties signed on May 1, 1971 (1971 Agreement). On December 3, 1987, Judge Thomas J. Terputac of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County (trial court) issued…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Callery v. Blythe Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Francis v. CorletoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Clark v. TroutmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Delaware River Port Authority v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Board of Supervisors of Willistown Twp. v. Main Line Gardens, Inc. and Coffman Associates, LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Ryon Realty Co. v. City of PottsvilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Borough of Wind Gap v. Teamsters Local 773 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.