Legal Opinion

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Chambers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1951No. 33553PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The principal complaint is that the facts found by the director do not-support the award. Instead of making findings of fact the director in almost every instance merely found that certain witnesses testified to various facts and did not find specific facts from such testimony. In such a situation the employer and insurance carrier cannot ascertain whether findings of fact are or are not supported by evidence. Where there are no findings of fact the finding of ultimate facts is not warranted unless possibly when all the evidence demands certain findings. See Southeastern Express Co. v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southeastern Express Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. DallasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dudley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Lee v. General Accident GroupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Pacific Employers Insurance v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Aetna Insurance Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Hodges v. Fidelity & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API