Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Dallas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 13, 1928No. 18780PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

(After stating-the foregoing facts.) 1. By section 57 of the workmen’s compensation act (Ga. L. 1920, p. 197), it is required that an award of the industrial commission be accompanied by a statement of the findings of fact upon which the award *40is made. This requirement contemplates a concise but comprehensive statement of the cause and circumstances of the accident as the commission shall find it to have occurred; and it is not enough to state merely in the language of the statute that the injury is or is not found to have arisen out of and in the course of employment. Southeastern Express…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southeastern Express Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Baum v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Ocean Accident & Guaranty Corp. v. CouncilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. OakleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Dudley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Lee v. General Accident GroupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Hodges v. Fidelity & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ManghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API