Legal Opinion
Lee v. General Accident Group
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 8, 1965No. 41398PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
The claimant contends that the board failed to make a statement of findings of fact sufficient to support the award, in that the board omitted to make a definite finding upon the question whether the claimant received an injury which aggravated a pre-existing condition so as to constitute a disability within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
“The Georgia Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code § 114-707) requires that an award of the Board of Workmen’s Compensation shall be accompanied by a statement of findings of fact upon which .it is made in order that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Southeastern Express Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- McDaniel v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Atlanta Transit System, Inc. v. HarcourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gatrell v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Wood v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Fulton Industries v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- General Motors Corp. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GentileCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.