Legal Opinion

Collins v. Woodhams

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1917No. S. F. No. 7913PublishedCited by 43 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County refusing to admit a will to probate. P. F. Gosbey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an order revoking the probate of the will of Betsey H. Collins, deceased.

The appellant has no interest in the estate except such as arises from the fact that he is the duly appointed and qualified executor of the will previously admitted to probate. The will provides for several legacies, and devises the residue of the property to the contestant. Respondent contends that the executor is not a party aggrieved and, hence, that he cannot maintain this appeal. This proposition is not well taken. When a will has been admitted to probate and the executor is duly appointed and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Estate of ChevallierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. In re Estate of RedfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. In Re Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. In re the Estate of McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Estate of ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API