Legal Opinion

Breen v. Donnelly

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1887No. 9566PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

— This is an action to reform a deed. Judgment went for plaintiff in the court below; and from the judgment and order denying a new trial defendants appeal.

The following are the material facts: On and before December 18, 1867, Patrick Breen and James Dunne *303were the owners in fee and in possession, as tenants in common, of a large tract of land containing over forty-eight thousand acres, and known as the Sobrante de San Lorenzo rancho, each owning an equal undivided interest. Prior to said last-named day, they had agreed upon a partition of the rancho, to be accomplished by ascertaining a line…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheils v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Isaacks v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. City of Oakland v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Mills v. SchulbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Danielson v. NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API