State v. Herme
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of felony theft, Minn. Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(1) (1978), and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum prison term of five years. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant contends (1) that his conviction should be reversed outright because the prosecutor violated his right to equal protection by discriminating against him in the charging decision, or (2) that he at least should be given a new trial on the ground that an instruction by the trial court on intent was plain error. We affirm.
Defendant’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- City of Minneapolis v. BuschetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Hamstead v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. CrockerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.