Medina v. Time Insurance
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Candido and Olga Medina brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) against defendant Time Insurance Company to recover benefits denied under an employee welfare benefit plan providing health care insurance. See 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) (authorizing actions for denial of benefits). The question presented is whether the administrator of an employee welfare benefit plan providing health benefits may, after the plan has taken effect, retroactively change the effective date of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Paul H. Goffman v. Boniface Gross, Danny Jaimet, Lieutenant MaueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Russell Wulf and Ronald Rentschler v. Quantum Chemical Corporation Quantum Employee Stock Ownership Plan for Hourly Represented EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boesel v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Waupaca Foundry, Inc. v. GehlhausenDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000