Legal Opinion
Boesel v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 16, 1999No. 6:95-cv-06128PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
This is an action pursuant to ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., in which former employees of the defendant Chase Manhattan Bank allege that the defendants used an incorrect formula to compute their retirement benefits. The plaintiffs state that they “seek retirement benefits that are expressly granted to them at Section 7.9 of the Current Chase [Retirement] Plan and in the two [summary plan descriptions (SPDs)] describing that Plan.” In the alternative, the plaintiffs allege that even if the correct formula was used to compute their benefits, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fitch v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Hogan v. MetromailDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Roberton v. Citizens Utilities Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Bjork v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2001
- Nelson v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002