Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Moore
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 26, 2006No. 04-1495PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
547 U.S. 250 (2006)
HARTMAN et al.
v.
MOORE
No. 04-1495.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 10, 2006.
Decided April 26, 2006.
Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General Keisler, Dan Himmelfarb, Barbara L. Herwig, Matthew M. Collette, Stephanie R. Marcus, and Richard Montague.
Patrick F. McCartan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Paul Michael Pohl and Christian G. Vergonis.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · SouterJustice Souter
This is a Bivens action against criminal investigators for inducing prosecution in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited37 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Callie Maidhof v. Mitchell CelayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- (BIVENS) Hodges v. MatevousianDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PC) Charles Davis v. Hanford Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Howell v. GallagherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019