Legal Opinion

(BIVENS) Hodges v. Matevousian

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 29, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00790Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MELVIN HODGES, Case No. 1:18-cv-00790-AWI-EPG-PC 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 12 v. DISMISS IN PART 13 ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, et al., (ECF No. 17) 14 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 15 16 Melvin Hodges (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 17 action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). 18 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint. For the reasons…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API