Legal Opinion
Stahel v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 7, 1933No. Nos. 29,418, 29,419, 29,420, 29,421, 29,422PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILTON, Justice.
In each of five actions tried to the court without a jury plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
Each action was founded on a life insurance policy issued by defendant to and upon the life of Jacob Feinstein, failer of plaintiff. The policies were ordinary life, three for $1,000 each, and two for $2,000 each. The following general statement applies to all the policies.
The beneficiary named therein was Feinstein’s wife. The policies further provided:
“If there be no beneficiary living at the death of the insured the amount of insurance shall be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bicker v. Charter Oak Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Parker v. . PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Wallace v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Allis v. WareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Morgan v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Decker v. New York Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
- Long v. CampionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Farmer v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936