Legal Opinion

Crocker v. Hopps

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 23, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

On the 18th of February, 1892, Andrew J. Carll made a chattel mortgage of certain personal property, consisting of horses, carriages and harness, to the appellee William Hopps. Subsequently Carll became insolvent, and having applied for the benefit of the insolvent law, the appellant, Samuel J. Crocker, was duly appointed permanent trustee. Whereupon the appellee, claiming title under his chattel mortgage, took possession of the property sued for, subsequent, however, to the conveyance thereof to the appellant as insolvent trustee. The appellee, as mortgagee, proceeded to sell not only the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  2. Butler v. RahmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. Rose v. BevanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  4. Buschman v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. Evans v. MerrikenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1836

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McElroy v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  2. First National Bank v. LindenstruthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  3. Cumberland Valley Railroad v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  4. Grimes v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
  5. Clark v. GrimesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API