Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 7, 1939No. A-9491PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, P. J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter to be called the defendants, Fred Smith and Bernice Mosier, were tried and convicted upon information in substance charging that in Tulsa county, on the 9th day of October, 1937, they did forcibly, conjointly, and feloniously take, steal, and carry away from the immediate presence and person of one Monte Bridges one black billfold, containing $42, being the property of Monte Bridges, said taking being accomplished by said defendants by means of force and fear, in that the said defendants did then and there conjointly and feloniously threaten to do said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Carrico v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Guthrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API