Legal Opinion
United States v. Wrensford
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided November 30, 2015No. Criminal No. 2013-0003Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(November 30, 2015)
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on “Defendant Craig Muller’s Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal or in the Alternative Rule 33 Motion for a New Trial.” (Dkt. No. 264.) For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the Motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendants Craig Muller (“Muller”) and Elvin Wrensford (“Wrensford”) were indicted in January 2013 on charges of possession of a firearm in a school zone, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(q)(2)(A) and 924(a)(1)(B) (Count One); using a firearm during a violent crime, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(iii) (Count Two);…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Michael DentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. J.D. Ashworth, A/K/A James Daniel Ashworth (86-6235) and Scott Ashworth, A/K/A Samuel Scott Ashworth (86-6236)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Gene Barrett Johnson, A/K/A Gexex JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Mark IafeliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Richard Caraballo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.