Legal Opinion

Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1925No. 2274PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

The Federal Trade Commission, after a full hearing, found unfair the methods of interstate business of Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Co., and on the 19th of April, 1924, ordered that:

“Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Co., Ine., doing business under the trade-name and style of Sealpax Company, its officers, agents, servants and employees, do cease and desist from directly or indirectly carrying into effect by co-operative methods a system of resale prices in which respondent, its customers and agents, undertake to prevent others from obtaining the Sealpax products of respondent at less…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hills Bros. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  2. Harriet Hubbard Ayer, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  3. Moir v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
  4. Indiana Quartered Oak Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  5. J. W. Kobi Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API