Legal Opinion
Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1925No. 2274PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Trade Commission, after a full hearing, found unfair the methods of interstate business of Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Co., and on the 19th of April, 1924, ordered that:
“Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Co., Ine., doing business under the trade-name and style of Sealpax Company, its officers, agents, servants and employees, do cease and desist from directly or indirectly carrying into effect by co-operative methods a system of resale prices in which respondent, its customers and agents, undertake to prevent others from obtaining the Sealpax products of respondent at less…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hills Bros. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Harriet Hubbard Ayer, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Moir v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
- Indiana Quartered Oak Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- J. W. Kobi Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.