Legal Opinion
Hills Bros. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1926No. 4493PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a proceeding to review an order of the Federal Trade Commission. The facts as found by the commission are substantially as follows:
The petitioner is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of California, with its principal office or place of business at San Francisco. Its capital stock is $2,000,000. 'It is extensively engaged in the business of importing coffee from Brazil and other foreign countries and selling the same in the United States, after roasting, grading, blending, and packing. Generally speaking, its sales are made to retail…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- People v. . BallardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- John Bene & Sons, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Blank v. Palo Alto-Stanford Hospital CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- State v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- United States v. New York Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.