Legal Opinion

Monick v. Melnicoff

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1958No. 2184PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This appeal raises the question of an attorney’s personal liability to pay the cost of a stenographic transcript ordered during the course of a proceeding in which the attorney appears on behalf of his client. Before stating the facts of this particular case we shall discuss the general principles of law on the subject.

The question usually arises in one of three situations. The first of these is when the attorney in ordering the transcript expressly either assumes or disclaims personal responsibility for the cost. Such cases present little difficulty. Clearly an attorney…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Petrando v. BarryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  2. Judd & Detweiler, Inc. v. GittingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
  3. Trimmier v. ThomsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  4. Batavia Times Publishing Co. v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Messenger Publishing Co. v. WalkinshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Theuerkauf v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. McCullough v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. United States v. 789 Cases of Latex Surgeon GlovesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Ingram v. LupoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Urban Court Reporting, Inc. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API