Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. Dyncorp International, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 9, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2015-0355Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) CHARLES HUTCHINS AND JOYCE ) SUBHI, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-355 (RMC) ) DYNCORP, INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION When Plaintiff-Relators alleged violations of the False Claims Act, all claims but one were dismissed. Without counsel, they now seek leave to amend their complaint pro se as Plaintiffs, not Relators on behalf of the United States, and so avoid final judgment. But the proposed amendment does not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. United States of America, Ex Rel. Richard Williams v. Martin-Baker Aircraft Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  4. United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. United States Ex Rel. Rockefeller v. Westinghouse Electric Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API