Moynahan v. Moore
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne Circuit. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Martin Ch. J. :
The plaintiff employed the defendant to repair a carriage, and the defendant retained the carriage under a mechanic’s lien for the amount due him for making such repairs. To obtain possession of the property the plaintiff tendered, as the jury finds, sufficient to discharge the lien. This tender necessarily operated to release the property, and the plaintiff was entitled to immediate possession of it. That such would be the effect of an unconditional tender is not doubted; but as the tender in this case was made upon condition that the carriag’e should be delivered up, it is…
2Cited by28 opinions
- Brinkman v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Renard v. ClinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Caruthers v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Mitchell v. RobertsUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.