Legal Opinion

United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 20, 1947No. 4560Published

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, C. D. 1024, sustaining the protest of appellee (a firm of customs brokers) against the classification by the Collector of Customs of certain merchandise, described on the invoice as “Alox-ite — Crude Aluminum Oxide Abrasive-82,” as a “refined bauxite” under the provisions of paragraph 6 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at one-half of 1 cent per pound. The merchandise was claimed to be free of duty under paragraph 1672 as “crude artificial abrasives, not specially provided for.”

The merchandise was exported by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
  3. Merck & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Harrison Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  5. Leber & Meyer v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API