Legal Opinion

Harrison Supply Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1915No. 1333PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7514 (T. D. 33980), Abstract 34346 (T. D. 34026), and Abstract 34374 (T. D. 34033).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

This case relates to the protests of the Harrison Supply Co., above named, as well as to those of five other importers, and á considerable number of importations and protests are here for review. The merchandise is generally known as iron shot, iron sand, or iron grit, and is of two classes, one globular and the other angular in shape. Quoting from the testimony of Mr. Harrison, the president and manager of the Harrison Supply Co., which seems to be accepted as correctly setting forth the same, we learn that the globular merchandise is produced in the following manner:

A miscellaneous amount…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrison Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larzelere & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. R. W. Greeff & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  3. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  4. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  5. United States v. C. J. Tower & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API