Legal Opinion

Engineered Demolition, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 9, 2004No. 03-2231CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

This contract case is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Plaintiff, Engineered Demolition, Inc. (“Engineered Demolition”), seeks to recover additional costs allegedly incurred under a contract pursuant to which Engineered Demolition at the behest of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps of Engineers”) removed, transported, and disposed of radiologically contaminated soil stored at the Hazelwood Interim…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roxco, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. AAB Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Engineered Demolition, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. AAB Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Dai Global, LLC v. Administrator of UsaidCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API