Legal Opinion
Engineered Demolition, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 28, 2006No. 03-2231CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
In this contract dispute, the government has moved for partial dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) and for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Engineered Demolition, Inc. (“Engineered Demolition”), seeks to recover $107,987 in additional costs, plus interest, allegedly incurred in completing a contract entered with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps” or “Corps of Engineers”) for the “removal, transportation, and disposal of radiologically contaminated material”…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Laboratory Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Affiliated Construction Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Barlow & Haun, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009