Legal Opinion

Doe v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1997No. A076721PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, P. J.

preliminary injunction barring the State of California’s enforcement of its interim emergency regulations enacted to comply with federal legislation, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.) (the PRA).

The PRA was enacted pursuant to the plenary authority of the federal government over immigration matters. The PRA, inter alia, enacted new eligibility rules for provision of public assistance by states or local entities to undocumented or illegal aliens, and eliminated the eligibility of such aliens (with certain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sudomir v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. American Transfer & Storage Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doe v. Commissioner of Transitional AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. Day v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  4. M & B Construction v. Yuba County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API