Legal Opinion
Aiello v. Hansen
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 31, 1973No. C-72-1402 SW, C-72-1547 SWPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZIRPOLI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other women similarly situated, challenge the provision of California Unemployment Insurance Code § 2626 which exempts pregnancy-related work loss from the coverage of the state disability insurance program until 28 days after the termination of pregnancy.1 Each *794suffered a pregnancy-related disability and solely because of § 2626, each was denied benefits. This treatment, plaintiffs argue, unconstitutionally discriminates against pregnant women. They ask that the court declare this portion of the statute invalid, enjoin…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Raike Ex Rel. MinnemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Samuel v. University of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Wiesenfeld v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
- 10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 435, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,035 Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Esther Skipper, Individually and on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Non-Supervisory Female Employees of American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Long Lines Department v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Long Lines DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.