Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. LaBundy
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 2005No. WD 64299PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Craig McIntosh sought judicial review under RSMo 2000 section 536.150 (uncontested case review under the Missouri Administrative Procedure Act), of a decision by the Missouri Department of Corrections not to place him on a list of qualified therapists for sex offenders. He appeals from a decision dismissing his petition for failure to state a claim because he had no property or liberty interest that would entitle him to judicial review of the decision. We affirm.
Facts
According to-his petition McIntosh is a licensed clinical social worker who received his master’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moss v. StockardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Bosch v. St. Louis Healthcare NetworkSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Missouri National Education Ass'n v. Missouri State Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- David Zink v. George LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Painter v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Janice E. Spurgeon v. Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan, Board of Trustees, and Judith Muck, Executive Director, Missouri Consolidated Health Care PlanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Whisphering Oaks Residential Facility, LLC v. Missouri Department of Natural ResourcesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- David Barrett v. Cole County, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.