Painter v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALOKAHUJA, Judge.
Appellant Paul Davis appeals from the circuit court’s Order and Judgment granting the Missouri Commission on Human Rights’ Motion to Dismiss, and denying Davis’s Application for Attorneys Fees and Expenses. We affirm.
I
On May 17, 2005, Davis filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus pursuant to Rule 94.01 and § 536.150 1 against the Respondent Commission and its Executive Director, Donna Cavitte (referred to collectively as the “Commission” or “MCHR”). Davis alleged that the Commission had wrongfully “administratively closed” its file concerning his complaint of discrimination…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Edward Hines Lumber Company v. Vulcan Materials Company, Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Richardson v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Martin-Erb v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Kinder v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goines v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Family Support & Children's DivisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Rebecca J. Davison v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ladd v. Missouri Board of Probation & ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Brams Trust 2 v. HaydonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Saxony Lutheran High School, Inc. v. Missouri Land Reclamation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.