Legal Opinion

Engel v. Gerstenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs, and judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence did not warrant the Appellate Term in deciding that the treatment administered by plaintiff constituted the practice of medicine, within the statutory definition thereof. * (See 102 Misc. Rep. 97.) Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ.

See Public Health Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 45; Laws of 1909, chap. 49), § 160, subd. 7; Id. § 174.— [Rep.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Engel v. GerstenfeldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AmberNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. LehrmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Rickman v. Terminal Barber Shops, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. MaybrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  5. People v. RubinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981