Legal Opinion

Rickman v. Terminal Barber Shops, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.

Motion by plaintiff to reargue the motion heretofore made to set aside the verdict of the jury in favor of the defendant is granted. Upon such reargument the motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial is denied.

*320The movant urges that the court erred in refusing to charge that defendant was required to be licensed in order to practice physiotherapy.

The mere use of an electric machine by defendant’s operators in rendering treatments to the plaintiff herein did not require that the operators be licensed‘as physiotherapists. The treatments rendered to the plaintiff may have constituted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LehrmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. People v. MariNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Engel v. GerstenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. People v. LehrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RubinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1979
  2. People v. MaybrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API