Engel v. Gerstenfeld
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, first district, rendered September 22, 1917, in favor of the plaintiff for $246.75 damages and costs, after a trial by the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.
This action was brought to recover a balance alleged to be due on a contract for “ professional services.” Plaintiff testified that she had been engaged for three years in the business of the removal of superfluous hair from women’s faces by the use of an electric needle, and that her office was at 16 Court street, Brooklyn. She claims that on January 5,1917, the defendant called at her office, accompanied by one *98Pearl Abrams, defendant’s niece, and that thereupon a contract was made between plaintiff and defendant whereby plaintiff was to give said Pearl Abrams treatments, for the removal of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. John H. Woodbury Dermatological InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- People v. . ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- People v. AllcuttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- People v. John H. Woodbury Dermatological InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Accetta v. ZupaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. AmberNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. LehrmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Engel v. GerstenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918