Legal Opinion

Amesquita v. Gilster-Mary Lee Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 2013No. ED 99266PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge.

Introduction

Fidel Amesquita, Georgia Hawthorne, Sara Lane, Rachane Thitakom, and Mary Whiteside (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s order granting the motions to dismiss of Gilster-Mary Lee Corporation (“GML”) and Eric Asselmeier (“Asselmeier”), Donald Welge (‘Welge”), Anthony Berry (“Berry”), and Gary Lay-ton (“Layton”) (collectively “Employee Defendants”). Plaintiffs alleged they suffered occupational diseases from diacetyl exposure while working at GML’s popcorn production facility and that GML is liable in tort for ordinary negligence and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wolff Shoe Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Western Blue Print Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. K.G. v. R.T.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  5. Robinson v. HookerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Leeper v. AsmusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Milton Young v. Boone Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Michelle Ideker v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Harris v. JungermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. TERRY LANKFORD, Employee, CAROL LANKFORD, WIDOW, Claimant/Dependent/Respondent v. NEWTON COUNTY, Employer/Appellant, and TREASURER OF MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND, Additional Party.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API