Legal Opinion

United States v. Donald Austin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 23, 1995No. 94-2541PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Donald Austin was convicted and sentenced to 8^ years for knowingly buying and selling counterfeit works of art. Although we uphold his conviction, the denial of his motion for a new trial, and all but one of the trial court’s sentencing determinations, we remand for a reconsideration of whether Austin deserved a sentencing enhancement under the Guidelines for being an “organizer or leader.”

I

Donald Austin owned and operated Austin Galleries, a chain of art galleries in Chicago, Detroit, and San Francisco. Austin, whose business grew from one Chicago gallery in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark A. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Green v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  3. United States v. Ronald T. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Gary Senn, Joseph L. Marino, Nathan Thomas Cannon, Alfred Destefano, and John WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Nilesh Patel, Also Known as Nick PatelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API