W. L. Moody Cotton Co. v. Heard

(after stating the facts as above).

Appellant complains of the judgment only so far as it was in favor of appellees C. E. Heard, A. G. Heard, Otis Tarlton, and John Fisher for the proceeds of the sale by Bedell of the 13 damaged bales they took from the pond after the fire. The contention with reference to that part of the judgment is that the testimony did not warrant the finding that the 13 bales were bales the parties mentioned stored in the yard, The testimony in that respect was far from being conclusive, but we are not prepared to say it was not lacking in probative force as to furnish…