Legal Opinion
Fontaine v. Riley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
Sec. 2304 of the Statutes for the year 1923 reads as follows:
“Every contract . . . for the sale of any lands or any interest in lands shall be void unless the contract or some note or memorandum thereof, expressing the consideration, be in writing and be subscribed by the party by whom . . . the sale is to be made or by his lawfully authorized agent.”
Sec. 2305 reads as follows:
“Nothing in this chapter contained shall be construed to abridge the powers of courts to compel the specific performance of agreements in case of part performance of such agreements.”
Where an oral contract for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blanchard v. McDougalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
- Knoll v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Dewey v. Spring Valley Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Russell v. FishWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Hibbert v. MackinnonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Seraphine v. HardimanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Krause v. HolandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Royston v. FrostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930