Seraphine v. Hardiman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
The basic issue is whether the Sera-phines met their burden of proving an oral agreement for the sale of the land and easements. According to the testimony offered by Seraphine, a gravel hauler, he made an oral agreement with Hardiman Oil Company, a partnership composed of Milo and Ralph Hardiman, brothers, which was the owner of a tract of land in the village of Sussex, Wisconsin. Seraphine testified that sometime prior to June 15, 1961, he entered into the oral agreement for six-tenths of an acre of land and certain easements to be used in connection with the land for $800. The purchase…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bump v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. SchuerbrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Wilcox v. CoumbeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Rodman v. RodmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Klapinski v. PolewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- State v. AmundsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Cudd v. CrownhartCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Outagamie County v. Melanie L.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Burg v. Miniature Precision Components, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.