Legal Opinion

Seraphine v. Hardiman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1969No. 149PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The basic issue is whether the Sera-phines met their burden of proving an oral agreement for the sale of the land and easements. According to the testimony offered by Seraphine, a gravel hauler, he made an oral agreement with Hardiman Oil Company, a partnership composed of Milo and Ralph Hardiman, brothers, which was the owner of a tract of land in the village of Sussex, Wisconsin. Seraphine testified that sometime prior to June 15, 1961, he entered into the oral agreement for six-tenths of an acre of land and certain easements to be used in connection with the land for $800. The purchase…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bump v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. SchuerbrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Wilcox v. CoumbeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Rodman v. RodmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Klapinski v. PolewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  2. State v. AmundsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cudd v. CrownhartCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Outagamie County v. Melanie L.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Burg v. Miniature Precision Components, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API