Knoll v. Harvey
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Winnebago County. The case is sufficiently stated by the court. The circuit court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff; and the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Downer J.
This is an action brought to compel á specific performance of an alleged parol contract*for the conveyance of ten acres of land. The contract is denied by the answer of the defendant duly Verified. At the trial, the plaintiff and defendant both testified as witnesses, one to the making of the parol contract and the other denying that he ever made any such contract. There was also other testimony on the part of the plaintiff to prove the parol contract. His son and son-in-law both testified Mtehe making of the contract, or to facts tending to prove it. ^
Qn the part of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blanchard v. McDougalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clarke v. Lincoln Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Railsback v. WalkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Thoemke v. FiedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Scheuer v. CochemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Long v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.