Legal Opinion
O'Donnell v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1956No. Civ. 16923PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
These are two appeals, one by O’Donnell, plaintiff in a negligence action for injury suffered when he was hit by a bus of defendant, from the judgment of dismissal of his action, because of failure to bring it to trial within five years after he filed it, and one by Pacific Employers Insurance Company, workman’s compensation carrier of O’Donnell’s employer and intervener in O’Donnell’s action, claiming costs of treatment and temporary compensation benefits paid and to be paid to 0 ’Donnell, from the judgment of dismissal of its action in intervention because of failure to bring it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Continental Pacific Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hoover v. SweitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Sanford v. Superior Court of Kern CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wright v. Groom Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Fannin Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Ziganto v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Wixted v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.