Legal Opinion

Peloza v. Freas

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1994No. S-4772/4796PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

This appeal concerns a challenge to the constitutionality of Kenai City Charter Section 2 — 1(b), which imposes a three-year dura- tional residency requirement for candidacy for the office of city council. Section 2-1 (b) of the Kenai City Charter provides:

Only qualified voters of the city who, at the time of their election or choice to fill a vacancy, are at least twenty-one years old, and have resided within the City for three years, one year of which must have been immediately prior thereto, shall be qualified for the offices of Mayor and other councilmen. If a…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hicklin v. OrbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Zeilenga v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. OstroskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Riley v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kodiak Seafood Processors Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Alaska Railroad Corp. v. Native Village of EklutnaAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API