Legal Opinion
Bell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 3, 1924No. 16-1919PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge. The
plaintiffs in error, Louie Bell and Velma Houston, were jointly indicted under three counts.
The first count charged the plaintiffs in error with violation of section 37 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10201), im that they did unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously conspire to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. .1923, § 1013814 et seq.), by agreeing to soil intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky, in violation of said act. Two overt acts are alleged: (1) The sale of one pint of whisky on the 24th day of December, 1923, to Mrs. R. H. Lewis for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Bens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Noble v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Moorehead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. WexlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Davidson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Dickerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.